Their recorded votes in Congress, including what was decided and how they voted.
Yea/Aye supports the question being voted on. Nay/No opposes it. Colors describe the recorded choice, not a political rating.
Partial vote history. See collection coverage
The Senate confirmed Bryan Bedford of Indiana as Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration for a five-year term. The confirmation vote was 53-43.
Context: Official Senate roll call held on July 9, 2025. The member’s recorded choice and the chamber’s overall result are separate.
Scott Kupor was nominated to serve as Director of the Office of Personnel Management for four years. The Senate agreed, 51-46, to limit further debate on his nomination; this vote did not confirm him.
Context: Official Senate roll call held on July 9, 2025. The member’s recorded choice and the chamber’s overall result are separate.
The Senate confirmed Preston Griffith of Virginia as Under Secretary of Energy. The confirmation vote was 54-43.
Context: Official Senate roll call held on July 9, 2025. The member’s recorded choice and the chamber’s overall result are separate.
Bryan Bedford was nominated to serve as Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration for a five-year term. The Senate agreed, 47-42, to limit further debate on his nomination; this vote did not confirm him.
Context: Official Senate roll call held on July 8, 2025. The member’s recorded choice and the chamber’s overall result are separate.
Preston Griffith was nominated to serve as Under Secretary of Energy. The Senate agreed, 47-41, to limit further debate on his nomination; this vote did not confirm him.
Context: Official Senate roll call held on July 8, 2025. The member’s recorded choice and the chamber’s overall result are separate.
H.R. 1 addresses taxes, spending and federal programs, and the statutory debt limit, among other matters. The Senate passed the bill, 50–50, with the vice president casting the deciding vote. Passing the bill in the Senate did not itself make it law.
Context: The supplied background summarizes the Senate-passed version dated July 1, 2025; the record does not provide a separate description of the precise amended text voted on.
The amendment replaced the text of H.R. 1 with a broad reconciliation measure covering taxes, health programs, agriculture, energy, immigration, defense, and other subjects. The Senate agreed to the substitute amendment, as amended, by a 51–50 vote, with the vice president breaking the tie. This vote approved the amendment to the bill; it was not a vote to pass H.R. 1 itself.
Context: The supplied text is the amendment as submitted on June 28, 2025. The vote record says the Senate agreed to it “as amended” on July 1, but the supplied records do not show the later changes; this summary describes the submitted version and may not capture the exact text agreed to.
Graham’s amendment proposed replacing the text of the underlying amendment with a comprehensive reconciliation measure covering agriculture and nutrition, defense, energy, taxes, health programs, immigration, and other subjects. The Senate agreed to the amendment, 51–50, with the Vice President breaking the tie. This vote adopted the amendment’s text; it did not itself pass H.R. 1.
Context: The dated June 30 submitted text is the version available for explaining the proposal; the roll-call record notes that a point of order struck page 1, lines 3–5 on July 1, but supplies no further text showing the final floor version. The summary therefore describes the submitted version, not every change in the text as voted on.
The amendment would have removed a provision delaying implementation of state matching fund requirements for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The Senate rejected the amendment, 45–55, so it did not make that change to the underlying bill.
Context: The record describes the amendment’s purpose but does not provide the text of the provision it would have removed.
The amendment proposed removing appropriations for the Office of Management and Budget from H.R. 1. The Senate rejected it, 50–50, so the proposed removal was not adopted.
Context: The record identifies the proposed change but does not specify the amount or details of the appropriations.
The amendment proposed using revenue from lease payments for the Metropolitan Washington Airports for aviation safety improvements and other purposes. The Senate rejected this amendment, 50–50; the vote decided whether to add this change to a pending amendment, not whether H.R. 1 passed.
Context: The vote concerned an amendment to a pending amendment to H.R. 1, not final passage of H.R. 1.
The amendment proposed repealing changes that terminate certain clean energy tax credits. The Senate rejected it, 49–51; this vote decided whether to add that repeal to a pending amendment, not whether H.R. 1 passed.
Context: The vote concerned an amendment to a pending amendment to H.R. 1, not final passage of H.R. 1.
The amendment proposed modifying the provision that ends the residential clean energy credit. The Senate rejected it, 48–52; the vote decided whether to add that change to a pending amendment, not whether H.R. 1 passed.
Context: The supplied description does not specify how the amendment would modify the termination provision. The vote concerned an amendment to a pending amendment to H.R. 1, not final passage of H.R. 1.
The amendment proposed maintaining equal treatment for wind and solar facilities under the tax code. The Senate rejected it, 47–53; this vote decided whether to add that provision to a pending amendment, not whether H.R. 1 passed.
Context: The vote concerned an amendment to a pending amendment to H.R. 1, not final passage of H.R. 1.
The amendment proposed striking a section relating to support for artificial intelligence. The Senate agreed to the amendment, 99–1, so it adopted this proposed change to a pending amendment; this vote did not pass H.R. 1 itself.
Context: The vote concerned an amendment to a pending amendment to H.R. 1, not final passage of H.R. 1.
The amendment proposed cutting Medicare prescription drug prices in half and expanding Medicare coverage to dental, vision, and hearing care. The Senate rejected it, 47–53, short of the three-fifths majority required; the vote did not decide whether H.R. 1 passed.
Context: The vote concerned an amendment to a pending amendment to H.R. 1, not final passage of H.R. 1.
This amendment sought to strike a provision limiting certain Medicaid payments from a larger amendment to H.R. 1. The Senate rejected the amendment, 48–52, so the proposed deletion was not adopted in this vote.
Context: The record does not describe the underlying limits or identify the larger amendment’s other provisions.
The amendment proposed ending wind and solar credits. The Senate rejected the amendment, 21–79, so this proposal was not adopted. This vote was on the amendment to another amendment to H.R. 1, not on final passage of H.R. 1.
Context: The supplied description gives the amendment’s purpose, not its full text; the vote concerned an amendment to amendment 2360, so it does not establish the final contents of H.R. 1.
H.R. 1 is a broad reconciliation bill addressing taxes, federal program spending and the statutory debt limit, among other matters. This vote rejected Warnock’s motion to send the bill back to the Senate Finance Committee with instructions; it did not decide whether H.R. 1 itself should pass. The motion was rejected, 48–51.
Context: The supplied background summarizes a July 1 version of the bill; the record does not specify the motion’s instructions.
This amendment concerned a program of scholarships for elementary and secondary students attending public, private, or religious schools. The vote rejected the amendment, 50–50, so this proposal to eliminate the scholarship program was not adopted. This vote was on an amendment to another amendment to H.R. 1, not on final passage of the bill.
Context: The amendment’s stated purpose describes the proposal; the record does not provide further details about the scholarship program.