Their recorded votes in Congress, including what was decided and how they voted.
Yea/Aye supports the question being voted on. Nay/No opposes it. Colors describe the recorded choice, not a political rating.
Partial vote history. See collection coverage
The amendment proposed requiring an adequate amount of deficit reduction as part of the budget reconciliation process. The Senate rejected the amendment, 24–76, so that requirement was not added to the budget resolution. The record does not specify what amount would count as adequate.
Context: The amendment description does not specify the amount of deficit reduction it would require.
The amendment proposed ensuring continued United States support for Ukraine as it resisted Russian aggression in Europe. The Senate rejected the amendment, 47–53, so it was not added to the budget resolution. The description does not specify what form or level of support it addressed.
Context: The amendment description does not specify the form or level of support proposed.
The Reed amendment proposed creating a point of order against legislation that would reduce Medicare and Medicaid benefits. The Senate rejected a motion to waive applicable budget rules for that amendment, 49–51; three-fifths support was required. This vote decided whether to waive the rules, not whether to adopt the amendment or change benefits.
Context: The vote concerned waiving budget rules for the amendment, not adopting its proposed point of order.
Baldwin Amendment 276 sought to create a Senate budget point of order against legislation that would take away health care from seniors, including nursing-home residents, through Medicaid cuts. This vote was on waiving applicable budgetary rules for that amendment, not on adopting the amendment itself. The waiver motion failed, 48–52, short of the three-fifths majority required.
Context: Official Senate roll call held on February 20, 2025. The member’s recorded choice and the chamber’s overall result are separate.
Wyden Amendment 1156 was described as seeking to prevent people from losing health coverage and suffering related harms. The Senate voted on whether to waive applicable budgetary rules for the amendment, not on adopting the amendment itself. The waiver motion failed, 47–53, short of the three-fifths majority required.
Context: The supplied description does not specify which health coverage or policy changes the amendment addressed.
Ossoff Amendment 407 proposed a deficit-neutral reserve fund related to protecting access to maternal and pediatric health care through Medicaid. The Senate rejected the amendment, 49–51. This vote concerned the budget-resolution provision, not direct changes to Medicaid coverage or benefits.
Context: Official Senate roll call held on February 20, 2025. The member’s recorded choice and the chamber’s overall result are separate.
Schumer Amendment 776 sought to prevent tax cuts for wealthy people if any Medicaid funding were cut. The Senate voted on waiving applicable budgetary rules for the amendment, not on adopting it. The waiver motion failed, 49–51, short of the three-fifths majority required.
Context: Official Senate roll call held on February 20, 2025. The member’s recorded choice and the chamber’s overall result are separate.
Sullivan Amendment 1029 proposed a deficit-neutral reserve fund related to protecting Medicare and Medicaid. The Senate agreed to the amendment, 51–49. A reserve fund in a budget resolution sets a framework for budgetary adjustments; this vote did not itself change Medicare or Medicaid policy.
Context: Official Senate roll call held on February 20, 2025. The member’s recorded choice and the chamber’s overall result are separate.
The amendment proposed a deficit-neutral reserve fund relating to support for federal wildland firefighters and associated personnel. The Senate rejected the amendment, 48–52; this vote decided whether to add that budgetary provision to the budget resolution, not whether a separate firefighter-support policy became law.
Context: Official Senate roll call held on February 20, 2025. The member’s recorded choice and the chamber’s overall result are separate.
The amendment would have established a deficit-neutral reserve fund related to reinstating fired employees at the Forest Service, National Park Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, and Bureau of Land Management. The Senate rejected the amendment, 48–52, so it was not added to the budget resolution.
Context: Official Senate roll call held on February 20, 2025. The member’s recorded choice and the chamber’s overall result are separate.
The underlying amendment would create a point of order against legislation that would raise costs such as electricity bills, building materials, and transportation. This vote was on whether to waive applicable budgetary discipline for that amendment, not on adopting the amendment itself. The Senate rejected the waiver motion, 47–53; three-fifths support was required.
Context: The record does not state the specific budgetary discipline at issue or the amendment’s further effects.
The amendment would have removed reconciliation instructions and created a reserve fund for a proposed multi-year agreement, with up to $171 billion for defense and up to $171 billion for other needs including border issues, veterans, farmers, nutrition, and disaster relief. The Senate rejected the amendment, 47–53, so it was not added to the resolution.
Context: The amendment describes proposed funding amounts; this vote did not itself provide that funding. The record does not establish the exact text adopted in the underlying resolution.
The Warner amendment proposed a point of order against reconciliation bills that would not lower housing costs for American families. The Senate rejected a motion to waive applicable budget rules for that amendment, by 47–53; three-fifths support was required. This vote decided whether to waive the rules, not whether the amendment itself was adopted.
Context: The record does not provide the text of the amendment or further details about how the proposed point of order would work.
The Merkley amendment proposed a deficit-neutral reserve fund concerning hedge fund ownership of single-family homes and rent prices. The Senate rejected the amendment, 48–52, so the proposed reserve fund was not added through this vote. The record does not specify the fund's design or what measures it would support.
Context: The supplied description gives the amendment's subject but not the reserve fund's details.
The Klobuchar amendment was described as seeking to stop tax cuts for the ultra-rich while families struggle to afford food. The Senate rejected a motion to waive applicable budget rules for the amendment, 48–52; three-fifths support was required. This vote concerned waiving the rules, not whether the amendment itself was adopted.
Context: The record does not describe the amendment's specific policy mechanism or provide further details about the tax cuts it addressed.
The Schumer amendment proposed preventing tax cuts it characterized as unwarranted for the ultra-rich. The Senate rejected a motion to waive applicable budget rules for that amendment, 47–52; three-fifths support was required. This vote decided whether to waive the rules, not whether the amendment itself was adopted.
Context: The supplied description does not specify which tax cuts the amendment addressed or how it would prevent them.
The nomination was for Kashyap Patel, of Nevada, to serve as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for a ten-year term. The Senate confirmed him, 51–49. This was the confirmation vote, not a vote merely to limit debate on the nomination.
Context: Official Senate roll call held on February 20, 2025. The member’s recorded choice and the chamber’s overall result are separate.
The nomination was for Kashyap Patel, of Nevada, to serve as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for a ten-year term. The Senate agreed to limit further debate on the nomination, 51–47. This vote did not confirm Patel; confirmation was a separate decision.
Context: Official Senate roll call held on February 20, 2025. The member’s recorded choice and the chamber’s overall result are separate.
Kelly Loeffler was nominated to be Administrator of the Small Business Administration. The Senate confirmed her nomination, 52–46, approving her appointment to that job.
Context: Official Senate roll call held on February 19, 2025. The member’s recorded choice and the chamber’s overall result are separate.
The resolution sets budgetary levels for fiscal years 2025 through 2034 and includes instructions for committees to develop legislation affecting the deficit. The Senate agreed, 50–47, to begin considering the resolution. This procedural vote did not adopt the resolution or pass any legislation developed under its instructions.
Context: The background describes the version introduced on February 13, 2025; it may not reflect later changes to the resolution.