Their recorded votes in Congress, including what was decided and how they voted.
Yea/Aye supports the question being voted on. Nay/No opposes it. Colors describe the recorded choice, not a political rating.
Partial vote history. See collection coverage
The Senate agreed to limit debate on John Hurley’s nomination to be Under Secretary for Terrorism and Financial Crimes. This vote did not confirm him; it set limits on the remaining debate, by a vote of 46–36.
Context: Official Senate roll call held on July 17, 2025. The member’s recorded choice and the chamber’s overall result are separate.
The Senate agreed to limit debate on Arielle Roth’s nomination to be Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information. This vote did not confirm her; it set limits on the remaining debate, by a vote of 50–34.
Context: Official Senate roll call held on July 17, 2025. The member’s recorded choice and the chamber’s overall result are separate.
The Senate agreed to limit debate on Bradley Hansell’s nomination to be Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security. This vote did not confirm him; it set limits on the remaining debate, by a vote of 57–31.
Context: Official Senate roll call held on July 17, 2025. The member’s recorded choice and the chamber’s overall result are separate.
The nomination would appoint Aaron Lukas of Arkansas as Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence. The Senate agreed to limit remaining debate on his nomination, by a 49–40 vote. This decision did not confirm him; it allowed the Senate to move toward a later confirmation vote.
Context: Official Senate roll call held on July 17, 2025. The member’s recorded choice and the chamber’s overall result are separate.
The nomination would appoint Cristian M. Stevens of Missouri as a U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. The Senate agreed to limit remaining debate on his nomination, by a 49–43 vote. This was not a confirmation vote; it concerned debate on the nomination.
Context: Official Senate roll call held on July 17, 2025. The member’s recorded choice and the chamber’s overall result are separate.
The nomination would appoint Joshua M. Divine of Missouri as a U.S. District Judge for the Eastern and Western Districts of Missouri. The Senate agreed to limit remaining debate on his nomination, by a 52–46 vote. This did not confirm Divine; it was a decision about debate on the nomination.
Context: Official Senate roll call held on July 17, 2025. The member’s recorded choice and the chamber’s overall result are separate.
H.R. 4 would rescind certain federal funds, including unobligated money for foreign assistance, international programs, and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, as proposed by the President. The Senate passed the bill, 51–48. Passage in the Senate is not by itself enactment into law.
Context: The dated background describes the version that passed the House; the supplied record does not establish that it is identical to the amended version passed by the Senate.
The substitute amendment would rescind specified unobligated balances for international organizations, peacekeeping, global health, migration and refugee assistance, development and other foreign aid programs, and rescind Corporation for Public Broadcasting funds for fiscal years 2026 and 2027. The Senate agreed to the substitute, 52–47; this vote adopted the substitute text as an amendment, not the bill as a whole.
Context: The dated text is the submitted substitute amendment; the supplied records do not establish whether it was changed on the floor before the vote.
The amendment would have removed the bill paragraph rescinding $15 million appropriated for the U.S. Institute of Peace. The Senate rejected the amendment, 48–51, so this amendment did not alter the bill. The vote was on this specific change, not on passage of H.R. 4 as a whole.
Context: The record identifies the amendment’s purpose but does not supply the full text of the amended bill.
The amendment to the rescissions bill would reduce the amount rescinded from International Organizations and Programs and ensure that UNICEF received its previously appropriated funding. The Senate rejected the amendment, 48–51. This vote decided whether to change the rescissions proposal in those ways, not whether to pass the underlying bill.
Context: The amendment purpose is supplied, but the amendment's full text and the underlying bill's final version are not.
The amendment would have reduced the amount of funding rescinded from assistance to Europe, Eurasia, and Central Asia. The Senate rejected the amendment, 49–50, so this proposed change was not adopted. This vote decided the amendment, not whether the underlying bill passed.
Context: The supplied records identify the amendment’s purpose but provide no dated background describing the underlying bill or confirming the version considered at this vote.
Murkowski's amendment to the rescissions substitute would replace its provision rescinding Corporation for Public Broadcasting funds for fiscal years 2026 and 2027. Instead, it would permanently rescind $8.33 million from specified allocations for each year. The Senate rejected the amendment, 47–51.
Context: The dated text is the submitted amendment; the supplied records do not establish whether it was changed on the floor before the vote.
The amendment would permanently cancel specified unspent federal funds, including money for international organizations, peacekeeping, migration and refugee assistance, foreign aid, and public broadcasting, with exceptions and minimum funding protections for some programs. The Senate agreed to a motion to table it, setting the amendment aside; this vote did not pass the rescissions into law.
Context: The dated text is the amendment as submitted on July 16; the supplied records do not establish whether it changed before the July 17 vote.
The amendment would have removed from the rescission funds for Feed the Future, a program described as supporting global food security, agricultural resilience, and agriculture research benefiting U.S. agribusinesses and universities. The Senate rejected the amendment, 48–51, so it did not make this change to the proposal. This vote decided the amendment, not passage of the underlying bill.
Context: No dated background or exact amendment text is supplied; the subject and proposed change are described by the amendment purpose.
H.R. 4 would rescind certain unobligated funds proposed for cancellation by the President, including funds for foreign assistance, U.S. agencies, and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. This motion proposed sending the bill back to the Appropriations Committee with instructions. The Senate rejected the motion, 48–51, so the bill was not returned to committee by this vote; the vote did not itself pass or defeat the bill.
Context: The background summarizes the House-passed version dated June 12, 2025, not necessarily the exact bill text at this Senate vote.
The amendment would have removed from the rescission funds for Global Health programs, including family planning and reproductive health. The Senate rejected the amendment, 48–51, so the proposed exception was not adopted. This vote decided the amendment, not passage of the underlying bill.
Context: No dated background or exact amendment text is supplied; the subject and proposed change are described by the amendment purpose.
H.R. 4 would rescind certain unobligated funds proposed for cancellation by the President, including funds for foreign assistance, U.S. agencies, and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. This motion proposed sending the bill back to the Appropriations Committee with instructions. The Senate rejected the motion, 47–50, so the bill was not returned to committee by this vote; the vote did not itself pass or defeat the bill.
Context: The background summarizes the House-passed version dated June 12, 2025, not necessarily the exact bill text at this Senate vote.
This amendment would reduce the rescissions from global health programs to preserve funding for programs addressing diseases. The Senate rejected the amendment, 46–51; this vote decided whether to adopt that change, not whether to pass H.R. 4.
Context: The supplied record does not include the text or a fuller description of the amendment.
H.R. 4 would rescind certain funds proposed for cancellation by the President, including money for international programs, USAID, and public broadcasting. The Senate rejected a motion to return the bill to the Appropriations Committee, 47–52. That procedural vote did not pass or reject the bill itself.
Context: The supplied record does not describe the motion’s instructions, so its requested changes cannot be specified.
H.R. 4 would rescind certain funds proposed for cancellation by the President, including money for international programs, USAID, and public broadcasting. The Senate rejected a motion to return the bill to the Appropriations Committee, 48–51. That procedural vote did not pass or reject the bill itself.
Context: The supplied record does not describe the motion’s instructions, so its requested changes cannot be specified.