Skip to content
Hill Policy
NJ · DISTRICT 3

Herbert C. Conaway, Jr.

DemocratNew JerseyCurrently serving

Sworn in for the 119th Congress on Source

How they voted 681

Their recorded votes in Congress, including what was decided and how they voted.

Yea/Aye supports the question being voted on. Nay/No opposes it. Colors describe the recorded choice, not a political rating.

Partial vote history. See collection coverage

House vote #101 · 2025H.R. 22
Yea

House rejected sending the SAVE Act on voter citizenship proof back to committee

AI-assisted summary

The SAVE Act would require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote in federal elections, with additional state voter-roll checks. The House rejected a motion to recommit the bill—an attempt to return it to committee for further action. That vote did not decide whether the bill's underlying policy should become law.

Context: The supplied record does not describe any instructions or conditions attached to the motion to recommit.

House vote #100 · 2025H.Con.Res. 14
Nay

House accepted Senate changes to the 2025–2034 federal budget resolution

AI-assisted summary

The budget resolution sets recommended federal budget levels for fiscal years 2025–2034 and directs House committees to develop legislation affecting the deficit and statutory debt limit. The House agreed to the Senate amendment, accepting the Senate's changes to the resolution. A budget resolution sets congressional budget guidelines; this vote did not itself enact the legislation that committees may develop.

Context: The supplied background summarizes the version introduced February 18, 2025, and does not detail the Senate changes accepted here.

Sources & original record
Official title
Establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2034
Official question
On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendment
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2034
Legislative background
Introduced in House · 2025-02-18. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
House vote #99 · 2025H.R. 1228
Yea

Require the VA Survivors Assistance Office to report to the Secretary

AI-assisted summary

The Prioritizing Veterans’ Survivors Act would place the Office of Survivors Assistance within the Department of Veterans Affairs Secretary’s office, rather than within the Veterans Benefits Administration. The House passed the bill under a procedure for considering measures on an expedited basis. This vote passed the bill in the House, but does not establish that it became law.

Context: The dated background describes the version introduced on February 12, 2025; the supplied records do not establish whether the text at this vote had been amended.

Sources & original record
Official title
Prioritizing Veterans’ Survivors Act
Official question
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Prioritizing Veterans’ Survivors Act
Legislative background
Introduced in House · 2025-02-12. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
House vote #98 · 2025H.R. 1526
Nay

Pass limits on federal district court injunctions

AI-assisted summary

The No Rogue Rulings Act concerns federal district courts’ authority to issue injunctions. The introduced version would allow an injunction only if it applied to the parties in the case before the court. The House passed the bill; that House vote does not by itself establish that it became law.

Context: The description is for the introduced version dated February 24, 2025; it may not reflect the exact text passed.

House vote #97 · 2025H.R. 1526
Yea

Reject sending the injunction-limits bill back for further action

AI-assisted summary

The No Rogue Rulings Act concerns limits on federal district courts’ authority to issue injunctions; the introduced version would limit injunctions to the parties in the case. The House rejected a motion to recommit, which would have sent the bill back for further action. This procedural vote did not itself pass or defeat the bill’s policy.

Context: The description is for the introduced version dated February 24, 2025; it may not reflect the bill’s text at this vote.

House vote #96 · 2025S.J.Res. 18
Nay

Pass resolution nullifying the CFPB overdraft rule

AI-assisted summary

The resolution would nullify a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau rule on overdraft charges at very large financial institutions. That rule generally capped charges at $5, allowed a higher cap with justification, or treated overdrafts as credit subject to disclosure requirements. The House passed the resolution; passage does not by itself establish that the rule was nullified.

Context: The background describes the rule and resolution version introduced in the Senate on February 13, 2025; it does not establish the exact text approved by the House.

Sources & original record
Official title
Disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to “Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions”
Official question
On Passage
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to “Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions”
Legislative background
Introduced in Senate · 2025-02-13. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
House vote #95 · 2025S.J.Res. 28
Nay

Pass resolution nullifying the CFPB payment-app oversight rule

AI-assisted summary

The resolution would nullify a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau rule defining which nonbank payment-app providers are large enough to be subject to CFPB supervision. The rule covered providers with at least 50 million transactions a year that were not small businesses. The House passed the resolution; passage does not by itself establish that the rule was nullified.

Context: The background describes the rule and resolution version introduced in the Senate on February 27, 2025; it does not establish the exact text approved by the House.

Sources & original record
Official title
Disappoving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to “Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications”
Official question
On Passage
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Disappoving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to “Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications”
Legislative background
Introduced in Senate · 2025-02-27. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
House vote #94 · 2025H.Res. 313
No

Approve rules for considering the Senate’s federal budget resolution

AI-assisted summary

The resolution set rules for House consideration of the Senate amendment to H. Con. Res. 14, a congressional budget resolution setting budgetary levels for fiscal year 2025 and fiscal years 2026 through 2034. The House agreed to the resolution, establishing the process for considering that Senate amendment; it did not itself adopt the budget resolution.

Context: The supplied description explains the resolution’s process but does not provide further details of its terms.

Sources & original record
Official title
Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 14) establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2034, and for other purposes
Official question
On Agreeing to the Resolution
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 14) establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2034, and for other purposes
Legislative background
Introduced in House · 2025-04-09. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
House vote #93 · 2025H.Res. 313
Nay

End debate on rules for considering the Senate budget amendment

AI-assisted summary

The resolution concerned House consideration of the Senate amendment to H. Con. Res. 14, which sets congressional budget levels for fiscal year 2025 and fiscal years 2026 through 2034. The House ordered the previous question, ending debate on the resolution and bringing it to a vote; this did not adopt the Senate budget amendment or the budget resolution itself.

Context: The supplied description summarizes the budget resolution, not the detailed terms of the House’s procedural resolution.

Sources & original record
Official title
Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 14) establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2034, and for other purposes
Official question
On Ordering the Previous Question
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 14) establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2034, and for other purposes
Legislative background
Introduced in House · 2025-04-09. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
House vote #92 · 2025H.Res. 294
No

Set consideration of bank fees, payment apps, courts, and voter registration

AI-assisted summary

The resolution set House consideration of two measures to undo CFPB rules on overdraft charges and payment-app oversight, plus bills addressing federal court injunctions and proof of citizenship for federal voter registration. The House agreed to the rule, which governs how those proposals may be considered; this vote did not pass or reject any of them.

Context: The descriptions are based on the listed introduced versions, dated before the vote, and do not establish the exact text considered under the rule.

Sources & original record
Official title
Providing for consideration of the joint resolutions S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28; providing for consideration of the bills H.R. 1526 and H.R. 22; and for other purposes
Official question
On Agreeing to the Resolution
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Providing for consideration of the joint resolutions S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28; providing for consideration of the bills H.R. 1526 and H.R. 22; and for other purposes
Related proposals
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
House vote #91 · 2025H.Res. 294
Nay

Limit debate on bank fees, payment apps, courts, and voter registration rule

AI-assisted summary

The resolution set House consideration of proposals concerning CFPB rules on overdraft charges and payment-app oversight, limits on federal court injunctions, and documentary proof of citizenship for federal voter registration. The House ordered the previous question, limiting further debate on the rule and bringing it toward a vote. This procedural vote did not decide those proposals’ policies.

Context: The descriptions are based on the listed introduced versions, dated before the vote, and do not establish the exact text considered under the rule.

Sources & original record
Official title
Providing for consideration of the joint resolutions S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28; providing for consideration of the bills H.R. 1526 and H.R. 22; and for other purposes
Official question
On Ordering the Previous Question
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Providing for consideration of the joint resolutions S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28; providing for consideration of the bills H.R. 1526 and H.R. 22; and for other purposes
Related proposals
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
House vote #90 · 2025H.R. 1039
Yea

Pass VA claims-notice reviews and extend home-loan fee rates

AI-assisted summary

The bill requires the Department of Veterans Affairs to seek an independent research center’s assessment of notices sent to people applying for or submitting VA benefit claims, report the findings, and implement recommendations. It also extends certain VA home-loan fee rates through June 23, 2034. The House passed the bill as amended on a motion to suspend the rules and pass; this vote alone does not establish that it became law.

Context: The description is for the introduced version dated February 6, 2025; the House passed an amended bill, and the supplied record does not describe the amendments.

Sources & original record
Official title
Clear Communication for Veterans Claims Act
Official question
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Clear Communication for Veterans Claims Act
Legislative background
Introduced in House · 2025-02-06. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
House vote #89 · 2025H.R. 586
Yea

Pass the Vietnam veterans bile duct cancer study bill

AI-assisted summary

The bill requires the Department of Veterans Affairs to study bile duct cancer among veterans who served in Vietnam and compare its prevalence with that among U.S. residents. It also calls for cancer-registry tracking and reports to Congress. The House passed the bill as amended; this vote approved the bill, not merely a step to begin considering it.

Context: The background describes the bill as introduced on January 21, 2025; the House vote was on an amended version, whose exact text is not provided.

Sources & original record
Official title
Vietnam Veterans Liver Fluke Cancer Study Act
Official question
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Vietnam Veterans Liver Fluke Cancer Study Act
Legislative background
Introduced in House · 2025-01-21. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
House vote #88 · 2025H.R. 1491
Yea

House passed bill on disaster-related tax deadline extensions

AI-assisted summary

The bill addresses federal tax deadlines postponed because of disasters and certain other events. It would treat a postponed tax-return deadline as an extension when calculating the period used to limit tax refunds, and include postponed payment deadlines when calculating the IRS deadline for sending certain notices. The House passed the bill as amended; this vote did not itself make it law.

Context: The supplied official summary describes the version introduced February 21, 2025; the House passed an amended version, whose differences are not provided.

Sources & original record
Official title
Disaster Related Extension of Deadlines Act
Official question
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Disaster Related Extension of Deadlines Act
Legislative background
Introduced in House · 2025-02-21. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
House vote #87 · 2025H.Res. 282
No

Set consideration of bank fees, payment apps, courts, and voter registration

AI-assisted summary

The resolution proposed terms for House consideration of measures to undo CFPB rules on overdraft charges and payment-app oversight, a bill limiting federal court injunctions, and a bill requiring documentary proof of citizenship to register for federal elections. The House rejected the resolution, so this rule did not set the terms for considering those proposals. The vote did not itself decide their underlying policies.

Context: The descriptions refer to introduced versions dated before the vote; they do not establish the exact text that would have been considered under the proposed rule.

Sources & original record
Official title
Providing for consideration of the joint resolutions S.J.Res. 18 and S.J.Res 28; providing for consideration of the bills H.R. 1526 and H.R. 22; and for other purposes
Official question
On Agreeing to the Resolution
Chamber result
Failed
Measure title
Providing for consideration of the joint resolutions S.J.Res. 18 and S.J.Res 28; providing for consideration of the bills H.R. 1526 and H.R. 22; and for other purposes
Related proposals
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
House vote #86 · 2025H.Res. 282
Nay

Limit debate on bank fees, payment apps, courts, and voter registration rule

AI-assisted summary

The resolution proposed terms for House consideration of measures concerning CFPB rules on overdraft charges and payment-app oversight, federal court injunctions, and proof of citizenship for federal voter registration. The House ordered the previous question, limiting further debate on the rule and bringing it toward a vote. This vote did not pass or reject those underlying policy proposals.

Context: The descriptions refer to introduced versions dated before the vote; they do not establish the exact text that would have been considered under the proposed rule.

Sources & original record
Official title
Providing for consideration of the joint resolutions S.J.Res. 18 and S.J.Res 28; providing for consideration of the bills H.R. 1526 and H.R. 22; and for other purposes
Official question
On Ordering the Previous Question
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Providing for consideration of the joint resolutions S.J.Res. 18 and S.J.Res 28; providing for consideration of the bills H.R. 1526 and H.R. 22; and for other purposes
Related proposals
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
House vote #85 · 2025H.R. 997
Yea

Pass the National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act

AI-assisted summary

The bill authorizes the National Taxpayer Advocate to appoint legal counsel within the Taxpayer Advocate Service, reporting directly to the advocate. It also expands the advocate’s authority to take personnel actions involving TAS employees. The House passed the bill as amended, approving the bill rather than simply deciding to begin considering it.

Context: The background describes the bill as introduced on February 5, 2025; the House vote was on an amended version, whose exact text is not provided.

Sources & original record
Official title
National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act
Official question
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act
Legislative background
Introduced in House · 2025-02-05. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
House vote #84 · 2025H.R. 517
Yea

House passed bill extending tax deadlines for disaster-affected taxpayers

AI-assisted summary

The bill would authorize the IRS to postpone federal tax deadlines for taxpayers affected by qualifying state-declared disasters, if requested in writing by a state governor. It would also increase from 60 to 120 days the automatic extension for certain taxpayers and relief workers affected by disasters. The House passed the bill as amended; this vote did not itself make it law.

Context: The supplied official summary describes the version introduced January 16, 2025; the House passed an amended version, whose differences are not provided.

Sources & original record
Official title
Filing Relief for Natural Disasters Act
Official question
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Filing Relief for Natural Disasters Act
Legislative background
Introduced in House · 2025-01-16. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
House vote #83 · 2025H.R. 1048
Nay

Pass the DETERRENT Act on foreign funding of colleges

AI-assisted summary

The DETERRENT Act expands disclosure requirements for colleges and universities receiving gifts or contracts from foreign sources, including lower reporting thresholds and additional requirements involving countries and entities of concern. It also provides for investigations and penalties for violations. The House passed the bill, approving it at this stage; this was not merely a vote to begin considering it.

Context: The background describes the bill as introduced on February 6, 2025; the vote record does not specify whether the final text differed from that version.

House vote #82 · 2025H.R. 1048H.Amdt. 15Floor amendment 6
No

Add entities linked to violence and rights violations to investment definition

AI-assisted summary

The amendment would have added to the bill’s definition of an “Investment of Concern” an entity that the Secretary of State determines knowingly and directly enables state violence, war or occupation, or severe violations of international law and human rights. It also specified certain business ties to countries facing related international proceedings or whose officials have outstanding International Criminal Court arrest warrants. The House rejected the amendment, so those changes were not adopted.

Context: The amendment was offered to H.R. 1048; the supplied description of the bill’s subject is from its introduced version, and does not establish the full bill text at this vote.

Sources & original record
Official title
H R 1048
Official question
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Chamber result
Failed
Amendment purpose
Amendment sought to amend the definition of "Investment of Concern" to include any entity that the Secretary of State determines consistently, knowingly, and directly facilitates and enables state violence and repression, war and occupation, or severe violations of international law and human rights.
House floor reference
Amendment 6 · Tlaib of Michigan Amendment No. 6. This floor number is separate from a Congress.gov amendment ID.
Legislative background
Amendment text read on the House floor · 2025-03-25. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Related proposals
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1