Skip to content
Hill Policy
U.S. SENATE

James Lankford

RepublicanOklahomaCurrently serving

Sworn into the Senate on Source

How they voted 917

Their recorded votes in Congress, including what was decided and how they voted.

Yea/Aye supports the question being voted on. Nay/No opposes it. Colors describe the recorded choice, not a political rating.

Partial vote history. See collection coverage

Senate vote #197 · 2025Nomination PN25-18
Yea

Limit debate on Peter Hoekstra’s nomination as ambassador to Canada

AI-assisted summary

The Senate voted on whether to limit further debate on Peter Hoekstra’s nomination to be U.S. ambassador to Canada. The motion was agreed to, 60–37, limiting the remaining debate under Senate rules; it did not confirm him as ambassador.

Context: Official Senate roll call held on April 8, 2025. The member’s recorded choice and the chamber’s overall result are separate.

Sources & original record
Official title
Motion to Invoke Cloture: Peter Hoekstra to be Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the United States of America to Canada
Official question
On the Cloture Motion PN25-18
Chamber result
Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-37)
Measure title
Peter Hoekstra, of Michigan, to be Ambassador to Canada
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
Senate vote #196 · 2025Nomination PN25-20
Yea

Limit debate on Mike Huckabee’s nomination as ambassador to Israel

AI-assisted summary

The Senate voted to limit debate on Mike Huckabee’s nomination to be ambassador to Israel. The motion was agreed to, 53–46, allowing the nomination to advance under the Senate’s debate rules. Limiting debate does not itself confirm him; the Senate must vote separately on confirmation.

Context: Official Senate roll call held on April 8, 2025. The member’s recorded choice and the chamber’s overall result are separate.

Sources & original record
Official title
Motion to Invoke Cloture: Mike Huckabee to be Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the United States of America to Israel
Official question
On the Cloture Motion PN25-20
Chamber result
Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)
Measure title
Mike Huckabee, of Arkansas, to be Ambassador to the State of Israel
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
Senate vote #195 · 2025Nomination PN25-14
Yea

Confirm George Glass as ambassador to Japan

AI-assisted summary

The Senate voted on George Glass’s nomination to be ambassador to Japan and confirmed him, 66–32. This was the final confirmation vote on the appointment, not a vote to limit debate.

Context: Official Senate roll call held on April 8, 2025. The member’s recorded choice and the chamber’s overall result are separate.

Sources & original record
Official title
Confirmation: George Glass, of Oregon, to be Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the United States of America to Japan
Official question
On the Nomination PN25-14
Chamber result
Nomination Confirmed (66-32)
Measure title
George Glass, of Oregon, to be Ambassador to Japan
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
Senate vote #194 · 2025Nomination PN25-14
Yea

Limit debate on George Glass’s nomination as ambassador to Japan

AI-assisted summary

The Senate voted to limit debate on George Glass’s nomination to be ambassador to Japan. The motion was agreed to, 67–32, setting limits on further debate but not confirming Glass. Confirmation required a separate Senate vote.

Context: Official Senate roll call held on April 8, 2025. The member’s recorded choice and the chamber’s overall result are separate.

Sources & original record
Official title
Motion to Invoke Cloture: George Glass to be Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the United States of America to Japan
Official question
On the Cloture Motion PN25-14
Chamber result
Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-32)
Measure title
George Glass, of Oregon, to be Ambassador to Japan
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
Senate vote #193 · 2025Nomination PN12-9
Yea

Confirm Elbridge Colby as Under Secretary of Defense for Policy

AI-assisted summary

The Senate voted on Elbridge Colby’s nomination to be Under Secretary of Defense for Policy and confirmed him, 54–45. This was the confirmation decision on the appointment, not a vote to limit debate.

Context: Official Senate roll call held on April 8, 2025. The member’s recorded choice and the chamber’s overall result are separate.

Sources & original record
Official title
Confirmation: Elbridge Colby, of the District of Columbia, to be Under Secretary of Defense for Policy
Official question
On the Nomination PN12-9
Chamber result
Nomination Confirmed (54-45)
Measure title
Elbridge Colby, of the District of Columbia, to be Under Secretary of Defense for Policy
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
Senate vote #192 · 2025Nomination PN12-9
Yea

Limit debate on Elbridge Colby’s defense policy nomination

AI-assisted summary

The Senate voted to limit debate on Elbridge Colby’s nomination to be Under Secretary of Defense for Policy. The motion was agreed to, 53–39, setting limits on further debate but not confirming Colby. Confirmation required a separate Senate vote.

Context: Official Senate roll call held on April 7, 2025. The member’s recorded choice and the chamber’s overall result are separate.

Sources & original record
Official title
Motion to Invoke Cloture: Elbridge Colby to be Under Secretary of Defense for Policy
Official question
On the Cloture Motion PN12-9
Chamber result
Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-39)
Measure title
Elbridge Colby, of the District of Columbia, to be Under Secretary of Defense for Policy
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
Senate vote #191 · 2025H.Con.Res. 14
Yea

Senate agreed to the 2025–2034 federal budget resolution

AI-assisted summary

The resolution sets recommended federal budget levels for fiscal years 2025–2034 and directs House committees to develop legislation addressing deficits and the statutory debt limit. The Senate agreed to H.Con.Res. 14, as amended. This was agreement to a concurrent budget resolution, not passage of the later legislation contemplated by its instructions.

Context: The background summarizes the version introduced February 18, 2025; the supplied record does not explain how the amended version differed.

Sources & original record
Official title
H.Con.Res. 14, As Amended
Official question
On the Concurrent Resolution H.Con.Res. 14
Chamber result
Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (51-48)
Measure title
A concurrent resolution establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2034.
Legislative background
Introduced in House · 2025-02-18. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
Senate vote #190 · 2025S.Amdt. 2152
Nay

Senate rejects middle-class tax relief amendment

AI-assisted summary

The amendment proposed tax relief for the middle class. The Senate rejected the amendment, 47–52, so it was not added to the underlying budget resolution. This vote decided whether to adopt that tax-relief proposal, not whether to pass the budget resolution itself.

Context: The supplied record does not describe the specific form or amount of tax relief.

Sources & original record
Official title
Rosen Amdt. No. 2152
Official question
On the Amendment S.Amdt. 2152 to S.Amdt. 1717 to H.Con.Res. 14 (No short title on file)
Chamber result
Amendment Rejected (47-52)
Measure title
To provide tax relief for the middle class.
Amendment purpose
To provide tax relief for the middle class.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
Senate vote #189 · 2025S.Amdt. 1989
Nay

Senate rejects amendment to remove Medicaid-cutting instructions

AI-assisted summary

The amendment proposed striking a provision directing the House Energy and Commerce Committee, during budget reconciliation, to cut $880 billion from Medicaid. The Senate rejected the amendment, 49–50, so that instruction was not removed by this vote. This was a vote on the amendment, not a vote to enact the budget resolution or make the Medicaid cuts.

Context: The vote concerned an amendment to the budget resolution; the record does not establish the final text of any later measure.

Sources & original record
Official title
Wyden Amdt. No. 1989
Official question
On the Amendment S.Amdt. 1989 to S.Amdt. 1717 to H.Con.Res. 14 (No short title on file)
Chamber result
Amendment Rejected (49-50)
Measure title
To strike section 2001(b)(4) relating to reconciliation instructions to the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives to cut $880,000,000,000 from Medicaid.
Amendment purpose
To strike section 2001(b)(4) relating to reconciliation instructions to the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives to cut $880,000,000,000 from Medicaid.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
Senate vote #188 · 2025S.Amdt. 2177
Nay

Senate rejects Medicaid access reserve fund amendment

AI-assisted summary

The amendment proposed a deficit-neutral reserve fund related to access to health care. It said this could include legislation to prevent Medicaid funding reductions that could lead to benefit cuts, loss of coverage, or reduced provider payments. The Senate rejected the amendment, 48–51, so it was not added to the underlying budget resolution; the vote did not itself decide whether to enact those policies.

Context: The description presents preventing Medicaid reductions as a possible use of the reserve fund, not as a specific policy enacted by this amendment.

Sources & original record
Official title
Warnock Amdt. No. 2177
Official question
On the Amendment S.Amdt. 2177 to S.Amdt. 1717 to H.Con.Res. 14 (No short title on file)
Chamber result
Amendment Rejected (48-51)
Measure title
To establish a deficit-neutral reserve fund relating to access to health care, which may include legislation preventing reductions in funding for Medicaid that could lead to benefit cuts, coverage loss, or slashed provide payments.
Amendment purpose
To establish a deficit-neutral reserve fund relating to access to health care, which may include legislation preventing reductions in funding for Medicaid that could lead to benefit cuts, coverage loss, or slashed provide payments.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
Senate vote #187 · 2025S.Amdt. 1529
Nay

Senate rejects amendment to preserve Social Security phone access

AI-assisted summary

The amendment proposed preserving access to Social Security’s phone service. The Senate rejected it, 48–51, so the proposal was not added to the underlying budget resolution. This vote concerned the amendment, not passage of the budget resolution or a separate decision changing Social Security phone service.

Context: The supplied record does not specify how the amendment would preserve phone access.

Sources & original record
Official title
Markey Amdt. No. 1529
Official question
On the Amendment S.Amdt. 1529 to S.Amdt. 1717 to H.Con.Res. 14 (No short title on file)
Chamber result
Amendment Rejected (48-51)
Measure title
To preserve access to Social Security's phone service.
Amendment purpose
To preserve access to Social Security's phone service.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
Senate vote #186 · 2025S.Amdt. 1693
Nay

Senate rejects Medicaid reserve fund for rural hospital concerns

AI-assisted summary

The amendment proposed a deficit-neutral reserve fund related to preventing Medicaid funding reductions that could contribute to rural hospital closures, higher costs for people with other insurance, or more uncompensated care. The Senate rejected the amendment, 49–50, so it was not added to the underlying budget resolution. The vote did not itself enact or prevent Medicaid funding changes.

Context: The record describes a reserve fund and possible concerns from funding reductions; it does not establish that those outcomes occurred.

Sources & original record
Official title
Baldwin Amdt. No. 1693
Official question
On the Amendment S.Amdt. 1693 to S.Amdt. 1717 to H.Con.Res. 14 (No short title on file)
Chamber result
Amendment Rejected (49-50)
Measure title
To establish a deficit-neutral reserve fund relating to preventing a reduction in Medicaid funding that could lead to rural hospital closures, cost increases for individuals with other kinds of insurance, or higher rates of uncompensated care.
Amendment purpose
To establish a deficit-neutral reserve fund relating to preventing a reduction in Medicaid funding that could lead to rural hospital closures, cost increases for individuals with other kinds of insurance, or higher rates of uncompensated care.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
Senate vote #185 · 2025S.Amdt. 1690
Nay

Senate rejects waiver for Medicare drug-cost point of order

AI-assisted summary

The Cortez Masto amendment proposed creating a point of order against legislation that would increase drug costs for people on Medicare, including seniors and people with disabilities. This vote was on waiving a Senate budget rule so the amendment could be considered despite that rule. The waiver failed, 49–50, below the three-fifths majority required; this did not decide whether the amendment’s policy became law.

Context: The record identifies the rule as section 305(b)(2) of the Congressional Budget Act but does not provide further detail about its application.

Sources & original record
Official title
Motion to Waive Section 305(b)(2) of the CBA re: Cortez Masto Amdt. No. 1690
Official question
On the Motion (Motion to Waive Section 305(b)(2) of the CBA re: Cortez Masto Amdt. No. 1690)
Chamber result
Motion Rejected (49-50, 3/5 majority required)
Measure title
To create a point of order against legislation that would increase drug costs for seniors and people with disabilities on Medicare.
Amendment purpose
To create a point of order against legislation that would increase drug costs for seniors and people with disabilities on Medicare.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
Senate vote #184 · 2025S.Amdt. 2126
Nay

Allow a simple-majority vote on a federal $17 minimum wage increase

AI-assisted summary

The amendment would make it possible for the Senate to increase the federal minimum wage to $17 an hour by a simple-majority vote. The Senate rejected the amendment, 47–52, so it did not make that procedural change. This vote concerned the amendment’s rule for considering a wage increase, not enactment of the wage increase itself.

Context: The record describes the amendment’s purpose but does not provide the text of the underlying resolution or additional details about the proposed wage policy.

Sources & original record
Official title
Sanders Amdt. No. 2126
Official question
On the Amendment S.Amdt. 2126 to S.Amdt. 1717 to H.Con.Res. 14 (No short title on file)
Chamber result
Amendment Rejected (47-52)
Measure title
To make sure the Senate can increase the Federal minimum wage to $17 an hour by a simple majority vote.
Amendment purpose
To make sure the Senate can increase the Federal minimum wage to $17 an hour by a simple majority vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
Senate vote #183 · 2025S.Amdt. 1644
Nay

Caregiver barriers reserve fund amendment rejected

AI-assisted summary

This amendment to the Senate budget resolution would have established a deficit-neutral reserve fund related to preventing increased barriers for caregivers, including people caring for seniors and children, home care workers, and others in the care economy. The Senate rejected the amendment, 49–50, so it was not added to the resolution. The vote addressed this amendment, not final passage of the budget resolution.

Context: The record describes the reserve fund’s purpose but does not provide its detailed budgetary terms.

Sources & original record
Official title
Kim Amdt. No. 1644
Official question
On the Amendment S.Amdt. 1644 to S.Amdt. 1717 to H.Con.Res. 14 (No short title on file)
Chamber result
Amendment Rejected (49-50)
Measure title
To establish a deficit-neutral reserve fund to prevent increased barriers to American caregivers, including individuals caring for seniors, children, home care workers, and individuals engaged in the care economy.
Amendment purpose
To establish a deficit-neutral reserve fund to prevent increased barriers to American caregivers, including individuals caring for seniors, children, home care workers, and individuals engaged in the care economy.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
Senate vote #182 · 2025S.Amdt. 2180
Nay

Social Security office closures amendment rejected

AI-assisted summary

This amendment to the Senate budget resolution would have sought to prevent DOGE from closing Social Security offices, preserving access to benefits for seniors and people with disabilities. The Senate rejected the amendment, 48–51, so it was not added to the resolution. This vote did not decide whether to pass the budget resolution as a whole.

Context: The record does not specify how the amendment would have prevented the closures.

Sources & original record
Official title
Hirono Amdt. No. 2180
Official question
On the Amendment S.Amdt. 2180 to S.Amdt. 1717 to H.Con.Res. 14 (No short title on file)
Chamber result
Amendment Rejected (48-51)
Measure title
To prevent DOGE from closing Social Security offices, preserving access to benefits for seniors and people with disabilities.
Amendment purpose
To prevent DOGE from closing Social Security offices, preserving access to benefits for seniors and people with disabilities.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
Senate vote #181 · 2025S.Amdt. 2107
Nay

Public land sale proceeds reserve fund amendment rejected

AI-assisted summary

This amendment to the Senate budget resolution would have established a deficit-neutral reserve fund related to preventing proceeds from public land sales from being used to reduce the federal deficit. The Senate rejected the amendment, 48–51, so it was not added to the resolution. This was a vote on the amendment, not final passage of the budget resolution.

Context: The record describes the reserve fund’s purpose but does not provide its detailed budgetary terms.

Sources & original record
Official title
Hickenlooper Amdt. No. 2107
Official question
On the Amendment S.Amdt. 2107 to S.Amdt. 1717 to H.Con.Res. 14 (No short title on file)
Chamber result
Amendment Rejected (48-51)
Measure title
To establish a deficit-neutral reserve fund relating to preventing the use of proceeds from public land sales to reduce the Federal deficit.
Amendment purpose
To establish a deficit-neutral reserve fund relating to preventing the use of proceeds from public land sales to reduce the Federal deficit.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
Senate vote #180 · 2025S.Amdt. 2186
Nay

Social Security cuts reserve fund amendment rejected

AI-assisted summary

This amendment to the Senate budget resolution would have established a deficit-neutral reserve fund related to reversing cuts to the Social Security Administration, including possible cuts ordered by DOGE or other cuts to services for seniors. The Senate rejected the amendment, 49–50, so it was not added to the resolution. The vote did not decide whether to pass the budget resolution as a whole.

Context: The record describes the reserve fund’s purpose but does not provide its detailed budgetary terms.

Sources & original record
Official title
Ossoff Amdt. No. 2186
Official question
On the Amendment S.Amdt. 2186 to S.Amdt. 1717 to H.Con.Res. 14 (No short title on file)
Chamber result
Amendment Rejected (49-50)
Measure title
To establish a deficit-neutral reserve fund relating to reversing cuts to the Social Security Administration, which may include cuts ordered by the Department of Government Efficiency or any other cuts to seniors' services.
Amendment purpose
To establish a deficit-neutral reserve fund relating to reversing cuts to the Social Security Administration, which may include cuts ordered by the Department of Government Efficiency or any other cuts to seniors' services.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
Senate vote #179 · 2025S.Amdt. 1760
Nay

Congressional debt limit instruction amendment rejected

AI-assisted summary

This amendment to the Senate budget resolution would have modified the instruction concerning the debt limit for the House of Representatives and the Senate. The Senate rejected the amendment, 5–94, so it was not added to the resolution. This vote addressed the amendment, not final passage of the budget resolution.

Context: The record does not explain what change to the debt limit instruction the amendment proposed.

Sources & original record
Official title
Paul Amdt. No. 1760
Official question
On the Amendment S.Amdt. 1760 to S.Amdt. 1717 to H.Con.Res. 14 (No short title on file)
Chamber result
Amendment Rejected (5-94)
Measure title
To modify the debt limit instruction for the House of Representatives and the Senate.
Amendment purpose
To modify the debt limit instruction for the House of Representatives and the Senate.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
Senate vote #178 · 2025S.Amdt. 1646
Nay

Ukraine security assistance amendment rejected

AI-assisted summary

The amendment proposed preventing disruptions to security assistance for Ukraine. The Senate rejected the amendment, 48–51, so it was not added to the pending amendment.

Context: The record gives the amendment's purpose but not its full text or the underlying resolution's terms.

Sources & original record
Official title
Bennet Amdt. No. 1646
Official question
On the Amendment S.Amdt. 1646 to S.Amdt. 1717 to H.Con.Res. 14 (No short title on file)
Chamber result
Amendment Rejected (48-51)
Measure title
To prevent any disruption in security assistance to Ukraine.
Amendment purpose
To prevent any disruption in security assistance to Ukraine.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1