Their recorded votes in Congress, including what was decided and how they voted.
Yea/Aye supports the question being voted on. Nay/No opposes it. Colors describe the recorded choice, not a political rating.
Partial vote history. See collection coverage
The amendment proposed reaffirming FEMA’s importance and its continuing role in providing nonpartisan, long-term disaster relief to survivors. The Senate rejected it, 48–51, so this proposal was not added to the pending amendment.
Context: The record gives the amendment's purpose but not its full text or the underlying resolution's terms.
The amendment proposed a deficit-neutral reserve fund related to preventing President Trump’s tariffs from raising the cost of groceries and everyday goods for families. The Senate rejected it, 46–53, so the proposed reserve-fund provision was not added to the pending amendment.
Context: The record gives the amendment's stated purpose but not its full text; it does not establish what specific policy or mechanism the reserve fund would contain.
The amendment proposed a deficit-neutral reserve fund related to protecting federal employees’ legally binding collective bargaining agreements and right to organize. The Senate rejected it, 48–51, so the proposed reserve-fund provision was not added to the pending amendment.
Context: The record gives the amendment's stated purpose but not its full text; it does not establish what specific policy or mechanism the reserve fund would contain.
The amendment proposed a deficit-neutral reserve fund related to barring use of commercial messaging apps to share details about the timing, sequence, or weapons of impending U.S. military operations abroad when disclosure could endanger service members. The Senate rejected it, 46–53, so the proposed provision was not added to the pending amendment.
Context: The record gives the amendment's stated purpose but not its full text; it does not establish what specific policy or mechanism the reserve fund would contain.
The amendment proposed striking a provision concerning instructions to the Committee on Agriculture. The Senate rejected it, 47–51, so that provision was not struck from the pending amendment.
Context: The record does not describe the provision's substance beyond its reference to instructions to the Committee on Agriculture.
This amendment to the Senate budget resolution would have established a deficit-neutral reserve fund related to preventing reductions in Medicaid enrollment or benefits. It covered people enrolled in Medicaid, including seniors, children, families, people with disabilities, veterans, and military families. The Senate rejected the amendment, 48–51, so it was not added to the resolution; this was not a vote on final passage of the budget resolution.
Context: The record describes the reserve fund’s purpose but does not provide its detailed budgetary terms.
The amendment would have created a point of order against legislation that would add more debt over 30 years than the country had accumulated over its previous 249 years. The Senate rejected the amendment, 46–53; this vote decided whether to add that procedural safeguard, not whether any debt legislation passed.
Context: The record gives the amendment’s purpose but not the text of the underlying proposal or details of the point-of-order procedure.
The amendment would establish a deficit-neutral reserve fund relating to protecting Medicare and Medicaid. The Senate agreed to the amendment, 51–48, adding that reserve-fund provision to the pending budget resolution; this vote did not itself enact a policy change to either program.
Context: The record does not provide further details about how the reserve fund would operate.
H.Con.Res. 14 sets recommended federal budget levels for fiscal years 2025–2034 and directs House committees to develop legislation affecting the deficit and statutory debt limit. The Senate agreed to begin considering the resolution. This procedural vote opened consideration; it did not approve the resolution or the legislation its instructions contemplated.
Context: The background describes the resolution as introduced February 18, 2025; the record does not describe any changes made before this procedural vote.
The Senate confirmed Harmeet Dhillon, of California, to be an Assistant Attorney General by a vote of 52–45. This was a final vote on her nomination, not a vote to limit debate.
Context: Official Senate roll call held on April 3, 2025. The member’s recorded choice and the chamber’s overall result are separate.
The Senate confirmed Mehmet Oz, of Pennsylvania, to be Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services by a vote of 53–45. This was a final vote on his nomination, not a vote to limit debate.
Context: Official Senate roll call held on April 3, 2025. The member’s recorded choice and the chamber’s overall result are separate.
S.J. Res. 26 would express congressional disapproval of a proposed foreign military sale of defense articles and services to Israel. The Senate rejected the attempt to bring the resolution out of committee, so this vote did not decide whether to approve or disapprove the sale.
Context: Official Senate roll call held on April 3, 2025. The member’s recorded choice and the chamber’s overall result are separate.
S.J. Res. 33 would express congressional disapproval of a proposed foreign military sale of defense articles and services to the Government of Israel. The Senate rejected the attempt to bring the resolution out of committee, so this vote did not decide whether to approve or disapprove the sale.
Context: Official Senate roll call held on April 3, 2025. The member’s recorded choice and the chamber’s overall result are separate.
Mehmet Oz was nominated to be Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The Senate agreed to limit the remaining debate on his nomination; this vote did not confirm him.
Context: Official Senate roll call held on April 3, 2025. The member’s recorded choice and the chamber’s overall result are separate.
The nomination was for Dean Sauer to serve as Solicitor General of the United States. The Senate confirmed his nomination.
Context: Official Senate roll call held on April 3, 2025. The member’s recorded choice and the chamber’s overall result are separate.
H.J. Res. 24 would disapprove the Department of Energy rule establishing energy conservation standards for walk-in coolers and freezers, thereby nullifying the rule. The Senate passed the joint resolution, 53–42; passage by the Senate alone did not complete congressional action. The resolution’s January 16 introduced version described the rule, but the record does not establish that this was the exact text at the vote.
Context: The background describes the version introduced January 16, 2025; it may not be the exact text passed by the Senate.
H.J. Res. 24 would disapprove the Department of Energy rule establishing energy conservation standards for walk-in coolers and freezers, thereby nullifying the rule. The Senate agreed, 51–46, to begin considering the resolution; this procedural vote did not pass the resolution itself. The resolution’s January 16 introduced version described the rule, but the record does not establish that this was the exact text considered at the vote.
Context: The background describes the version introduced January 16, 2025; it may not be the exact text considered by the Senate.
The resolution would terminate the national emergency declared to impose duties on goods imported from Canada. The Senate passed the resolution, 51–48; this vote approved the joint resolution in the Senate, rather than merely limiting debate.
Context: The supplied background describes the version introduced March 11, 2025; it does not establish whether the text was amended before this vote.
The nomination is for Harmeet Dhillon to serve as an assistant attorney general. The Senate agreed, 52–45, to limit debate on her nomination; this did not confirm her, and debate was not instantly ended.
Context: Official Senate roll call held on April 2, 2025. The member’s recorded choice and the chamber’s overall result are separate.
The nomination is for Dean Sauer to serve as solicitor general of the United States. The Senate agreed, 53–46, to limit debate on his nomination; this did not confirm him, and debate was not instantly ended.
Context: Official Senate roll call held on April 2, 2025. The member’s recorded choice and the chamber’s overall result are separate.