Skip to content
Hill Policy
LA · DISTRICT 4

Mike Johnson

RepublicanLouisianaCurrently serving

Sworn in for the 119th Congress on Source

How they voted 527

Their recorded votes in Congress, including what was decided and how they voted.

Yea/Aye supports the question being voted on. Nay/No opposes it. Colors describe the recorded choice, not a political rating.

Partial vote history. See collection coverage

House vote #6 · 2026H.R. 6938
Yea

Keep energy and interior divisions in appropriations bill

AI-assisted summary

Divisions B and C are portions of the 2026 appropriations bill covering energy and water development, and interior and environmental programs. The House voted to retain those divisions in the bill; this was not a separate vote passing the entire bill. The available summary describes the bill's broad subject and agencies, but does not specify the detailed provisions of either division.

Context: The background summarizes the January 6 introduced bill and does not identify the exact contents of Divisions B and C in the text voted on.

Sources & original record
Official title
Commerce, Justice, Science; Energy and Water Development; and Interior and Environment Appropriations Act, 2026
Official question
On Retaining Divisions B and C
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Commerce, Justice, Science; Energy and Water Development; and Interior and Environment Appropriations Act, 2026
Legislative background
Introduced in House · 2026-01-06. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 2
House vote #5 · 2026H.R. 6938
Yea

Keep commerce, justice, and science division in appropriations bill

AI-assisted summary

Division A is part of the 2026 appropriations bill, which funds federal activities involving commerce, law enforcement, and science, among other areas. The House voted to retain Division A in the bill; this was not a separate vote passing the entire bill. The available summary does not specify the division's detailed provisions.

Context: The background summarizes the January 6 introduced bill and does not identify the exact contents of Division A in the text voted on.

Sources & original record
Official title
Commerce, Justice, Science; Energy and Water Development; and Interior and Environment Appropriations Act, 2026
Official question
On Retaining Division A
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Commerce, Justice, Science; Energy and Water Development; and Interior and Environment Appropriations Act, 2026
Legislative background
Introduced in House · 2026-01-06. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 2
House vote #4 · 2026H.Res. 780
Nay

Move the Breaking the Gridlock Act debate rule out of committee

AI-assisted summary

The vote was whether to move H.Res. 780, a rule for considering the Breaking the Gridlock Act (H.R. 1834), out of committee. The rule would allow House consideration of the bill, including a substitute amendment and debate before a final-passage vote; this vote did not pass the bill itself. The introduced bill covers a range of topics, including a congressional time capsule, fire-suppression payments, and limits on transferring sensitive data to foreign adversaries.

Context: The bill’s described contents are from its introduced version. The rule allows a later substitute, so that version is not established as the text the House would consider.

House vote #3 · 2026H.Res. 977
Aye

Adopt a rule for considering showerhead, housing, and funding bills

AI-assisted summary

The resolution set rules for considering bills to revise the definition of showerhead, bar enforcement of energy-efficiency standards for manufactured housing, and provide consolidated appropriations for fiscal year 2026. The House agreed to the resolution, establishing how those bills would be considered; this vote did not pass the bills themselves.

Context: The background describes the resolution as reported on January 7, 2026; it does not establish the exact text of the bills considered under the rule.

Sources & original record
Official title
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4593) the SHOWER Act; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5184) the Affordable HOMES Act; and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6938) making consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes
Official question
On Agreeing to the Resolution
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4593) the SHOWER Act; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5184) the Affordable HOMES Act; and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6938) making consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes
Legislative background
Reported to House · 2026-01-07. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 2
House vote #2 · 2026H.Res. 977
Yea

End debate on rules for showerhead, housing and spending bills

AI-assisted summary

The resolution sets rules for considering H.R. 4593, which would revise the legal definition of showerhead; H.R. 5184, which would bar enforcement of energy-efficiency standards for manufactured housing; and H.R. 6938, a fiscal 2026 appropriations bill. The House voted to close debate on the resolution and move to a vote on it. This did not pass the resolution or any of the three bills.

Context: Official House roll call held on January 7, 2026. The member’s recorded choice and the chamber’s overall result are separate.

Sources & original record
Official title
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4593) the SHOWER Act; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5184) the Affordable HOMES Act; and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6938) making consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes
Official question
On Ordering the Previous Question
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4593) the SHOWER Act; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5184) the Affordable HOMES Act; and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6938) making consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes
Legislative background
Reported to House · 2026-01-07. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 2
House vote #362 · 2025H.R. 498
Yea

Pass Medicaid restrictions on specified gender-transition care for minors

AI-assisted summary

The Do No Harm in Medicaid Act would prohibit federal Medicaid payments for specified gender-transition procedures for people under 18, including certain surgeries, implants and medications. It includes exceptions for procedures with parental or guardian consent in specified circumstances, such as treating certain conditions or preventing imminent death or serious bodily-function impairment. The House passed the bill; this vote did not itself make it law.

Context: The background describes the bill as introduced on January 16, 2025; the supplied record does not establish whether the text passed on December 18 was amended from that version.

House vote #361 · 2025H.R. 498
Nay

Reject motion to recommit the Do No Harm in Medicaid Act

AI-assisted summary

The Do No Harm in Medicaid Act would prohibit federal Medicaid payments for specified gender-transition procedures for people under 18, with stated exceptions for certain medically necessary circumstances. The House rejected a motion to recommit the bill, a step that would have sent it back to committee before a final passage vote. The motion’s defeat did not itself pass or reject the bill.

Context: The supplied background summarizes the bill as introduced on January 16, 2025; it does not describe the motion’s specific instructions or establish whether the bill text had changed.

Sources & original record
Official title
Do No Harm in Medicaid Act
Official question
On Motion to Recommit
Chamber result
Failed
Measure title
Do No Harm in Medicaid Act
Legislative background
Introduced in House · 2025-01-16. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
House vote #360 · 2025H.R. 845
Yea

House passed the bill requiring gray wolf protections to be removed

AI-assisted summary

The Pet and Livestock Protection Act directs the Interior Department to reissue a 2020 rule removing most gray wolves in the lower 48 states from Endangered Species Act protections, and bars judicial review of that reissued rule. The House passed the bill; this vote was on passage, not on whether the bill became law.

Context: The background describes the bill as introduced; the exact text voted on may have differed.

Sources & original record
Official title
Pet and Livestock Protection Act
Official question
On Passage
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Pet and Livestock Protection Act
Legislative background
Introduced in House · 2025-01-31. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
House vote #359 · 2025H.R. 845
Nay

House rejected sending the gray wolf protections bill back

AI-assisted summary

The Pet and Livestock Protection Act would require the Interior Department to reissue a rule removing most gray wolves in the lower 48 states from Endangered Species Act protections, and bar judicial review of that rule. The House rejected a motion to recommit, which would have sent the bill back to committee; this vote did not decide whether the bill's policy would become law.

Context: The background describes the bill as introduced; the exact text voted on may have differed. The supplied record does not give the motion's instructions.

Sources & original record
Official title
Pet and Livestock Protection Act
Official question
On Motion to Recommit
Chamber result
Failed
Measure title
Pet and Livestock Protection Act
Legislative background
Introduced in House · 2025-01-31. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
House vote #358 · 2025H.R. 1366
Yea

House passed bill allowing mining waste use of federal lands

AI-assisted summary

The Mining Regulatory Clarity Act allows mining operators to use federal land for related activities such as waste disposal, including land without deposits shown to be valuable for mining. It also directs fees from certain mill site claims to an abandoned hardrock mine reclamation fund. The House passed the bill; this vote was on passage, not on whether it became law.

Context: The background summarizes the version reported to the House; the exact text voted on may have differed.

Sources & original record
Official title
Mining Regulatory Clarity Act
Official question
On Passage
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Mining Regulatory Clarity Act
Legislative background
Reported to House · 2025-11-25. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
House vote #357 · 2025H.R. 1366
Nay

House rejected sending the mining land use bill back

AI-assisted summary

The Mining Regulatory Clarity Act would allow mining operators to use federal land for related activities such as waste disposal, and direct certain fees to an abandoned hardrock mine reclamation fund. The House rejected a motion to recommit, which would have sent the bill back to committee; this vote did not decide whether those policies would become law.

Context: The background summarizes the version reported to the House; the exact text voted on may have differed. The supplied record does not give the motion's instructions.

Sources & original record
Official title
Mining Regulatory Clarity Act
Official question
On Motion to Recommit
Chamber result
Failed
Measure title
Mining Regulatory Clarity Act
Legislative background
Reported to House · 2025-11-25. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
House vote #356 · 2025H.R. 4776
Yea

House passed bill changing federal environmental reviews

AI-assisted summary

The SPEED Act changes reviews under the National Environmental Policy Act, including by narrowing which federal actions trigger review and limiting the effects agencies consider. It also changes review timelines and limits judicial review of NEPA cases. The House passed the bill; this vote was on passage, not on whether it became law.

Context: The background summarizes the version reported to the House; the exact text voted on may have differed.

House vote #355 · 2025H.R. 4776
Nay

House rejected sending the federal environmental review bill back

AI-assisted summary

The SPEED Act would change reviews under the National Environmental Policy Act, including by narrowing which federal actions trigger review and limiting the effects agencies consider. The House rejected a motion to recommit, which would have sent the bill back to committee; this vote did not decide whether those changes would become law.

Context: The background summarizes the version reported to the House; the exact text voted on may have differed. The supplied record does not give the motion's instructions.

House vote #352 · 2025H.R. 4776Floor amendment 1
Aye

Amendment to the SPEED Act’s environmental review rules

AI-assisted summary

The SPEED Act would narrow which federal projects receive review under the National Environmental Policy Act and change how agencies assess effects and complete reviews. The House rejected Clyde of Georgia’s Amendment No. 1, so the amendment was not added to the bill. The available record does not describe what the amendment itself would have changed.

Context: The dated background describes the SPEED Act version reported on December 4, 2025; it does not establish the amendment’s text or whether the bill’s text had changed by this vote.

Sources & original record
Official title
H R 4776
Official question
On Agreeing to the Amendment
Chamber result
Failed
House floor reference
Amendment 1 · Clyde of Georgia Amendment No. 1. This floor number is separate from a Congress.gov amendment ID.
Legislative background
Reported to House · 2025-12-04. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
House vote #351 · 2025H.R. 3492
Yea

House passed bill creating federal offenses for gender-affirming care for minors

AI-assisted summary

The Protect Children’s Innocence Act would create federal criminal offenses for providing specified gender-affirming procedures or medications to minors and broaden the federal prohibition on female genital mutilation involving minors. The House voted to pass the bill, and it passed. This was a vote on passage, not a vote establishing that the bill became law.

Context: The background summarizes the bill as introduced; the supplied record does not establish whether the text at passage was amended.

Sources & original record
Official title
Protect Children’s Innocence Act
Official question
On Passage
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Protect Children’s Innocence Act
Legislative background
Introduced in House · 2025-05-19. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
House vote #350 · 2025H.R. 3492
Nay

Motion to return the children’s gender-care bill to committee failed

AI-assisted summary

The Protect Children’s Innocence Act would create federal criminal offenses for providing specified gender-affirming care to minors and change federal law on female genital mutilation involving minors. This vote was on a motion to recommit, which would have sent the bill back to committee; the motion failed. The vote did not decide whether the bill’s underlying policies should become law.

Context: The background summarizes the bill as introduced; the record does not provide any instructions that may have accompanied the recommit motion.

Sources & original record
Official title
Protect Children’s Innocence Act
Official question
On Motion to Recommit
Chamber result
Failed
Measure title
Protect Children’s Innocence Act
Legislative background
Introduced in House · 2025-05-19. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
House vote #349 · 2025H.R. 6703
Yea

Passage of the Lower Health Care Premiums Act

AI-assisted summary

The bill would make changes to employer health coverage, including allowing qualifying employer associations to offer group health plans, and would require pharmacy benefit managers to provide detailed reports about drug prices, rebates, and related payments. It also includes provisions on health reimbursement arrangements and federal cost-sharing payments for health plans. The House passed the bill; this vote approved the measure in the House, not its enactment into law.

Context: The supplied full text is the introduced version dated December 15, 2025; it does not establish that every provision remained unchanged in the version passed on December 17.

House vote #348 · 2025H.R. 6703
Nay

Recommit the Lower Health Care Premiums Act to committee

AI-assisted summary

The bill addresses employer health coverage and pharmacy-benefit-manager reporting on drug prices, rebates, and related payments, among other health-care provisions. This vote was on whether to send the bill back to committee for further consideration, not on passing the bill itself. The motion to recommit failed; that result did not itself enact or reject the bill’s policy provisions.

Context: The supplied full text is the introduced version dated December 15, 2025. No text or instructions for the recommit motion are provided, so its specific requested changes cannot be described.

House vote #347 · 2025H.R. 3616
Yea

House passed Reliable Power Act on federal review of power rules

AI-assisted summary

The Reliable Power Act would require annual assessments of electric-system reliability and create a process for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to review certain proposed federal regulations if generation is found inadequate. The House voted to pass the bill, and it passed. This was a vote on passage, not a vote establishing that the bill became law.

Context: The background summarizes the reported bill version; the supplied record does not establish whether the text at passage was amended.

House vote #346 · 2025H.Con.Res. 64
Nay

Venezuela hostilities resolution to direct U.S. forces' removal

AI-assisted summary

The resolution would direct the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities within or against Venezuela unless Congress declared war or authorized the use of military force for that purpose. The House rejected the resolution, so this vote did not direct the removal of forces.

Context: The background describes the introduced version; it does not establish the exact text considered at the vote.

Sources & original record
Official title
To direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against Venezuela that have not been authorized by Congress
Official question
On Agreeing to the Resolution
Chamber result
Failed
Measure title
To direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against Venezuela that have not been authorized by Congress
Legislative background
Introduced in House · 2025-12-01. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1