Skip to content
Hill Policy
LA · DISTRICT 4

Mike Johnson

RepublicanLouisianaCurrently serving

Sworn in for the 119th Congress on Source

How they voted 527

Their recorded votes in Congress, including what was decided and how they voted.

Yea/Aye supports the question being voted on. Nay/No opposes it. Colors describe the recorded choice, not a political rating.

Partial vote history. See collection coverage

All votes (527)Yea / Aye (415)Nay / No (110)Present (1)Other (1)
House vote #113 · 2025H.J.Res. 78
Yea

House passes resolution to nullify longfin smelt protections

AI-assisted summary

The resolution would nullify a Fish and Wildlife Service rule listing the San Francisco Bay-Delta population of longfin smelt as endangered, removing that species’ protection under the Endangered Species Act. The House passed the joint resolution. This vote approved the resolution in the House; it did not itself complete the process for changing the rule.

Context: The background summarizes the resolution introduced on March 21, 2025; it does not establish whether the text changed before passage.

Sources & original record
Official title
Congressional disapproval, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service relating to “Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Species Status for the San Francisco Bay-Delta Distinct Population Segment of the Longfin Smelt”
Official question
On Passage
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Congressional disapproval, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service relating to “Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Species Status for the San Francisco Bay-Delta Distinct Population Segment of the Longfin Smelt”
Legislative background
Introduced in House · 2025-03-21. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
Official vote record Official proposal details
House vote #112 · 2025H.J.Res. 89
Yea

House passes resolution to overturn California heavy-duty vehicle emissions waiver

AI-assisted summary

The resolution would nullify an EPA notice granting California a waiver for its Heavy-Duty Vehicle and Engine Omnibus Low NOX regulations. The House passed the resolution. This was a vote on the resolution itself, not merely on whether to consider it.

Context: The background summarizes the version introduced April 2, 2025; the record does not establish whether the text passed differed from that version.

Sources & original record
Official title
Congressional disapproval, of the rule submitted by the EPA relating to “California State Motor Vehicle and Engine and Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; The ’Omnibus’ Low NOX Regulation; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision”
Official question
On Passage
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Congressional disapproval, of the rule submitted by the EPA relating to “California State Motor Vehicle and Engine and Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; The ’Omnibus’ Low NOX Regulation; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision”
Legislative background
Introduced in House · 2025-04-02. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
Official vote record Official proposal details
House vote #111 · 2025H.J.Res. 87
Yea

House passes resolution to overturn California vehicle emissions waivers

AI-assisted summary

The resolution would nullify an EPA notice granting California waivers for several vehicle-emissions regulations, including requirements for heavy-duty vehicle warranties and maintenance. The House passed the resolution. This was a vote on the resolution itself, not merely on whether to consider it.

Context: The background summarizes the version introduced April 2, 2025; the record does not establish whether the text passed differed from that version.

Sources & original record
Official title
Congressional disapproval, of the rule submitted by the EPA relating to “CA Motor Vehicle and Engine Pollution Control Standards; Heavy-Duty Vehicle and Engine Em Warranty and Maintenance Provisions; Advanced Clean Trucks; Zero Em Airport Shuttle; Zero-Em Power Train Cert.; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision”
Official question
On Passage
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Congressional disapproval, of the rule submitted by the EPA relating to “CA Motor Vehicle and Engine Pollution Control Standards; Heavy-Duty Vehicle and Engine Em Warranty and Maintenance Provisions; Advanced Clean Trucks; Zero Em Airport Shuttle; Zero-Em Power Train Cert.; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision”
Legislative background
Introduced in House · 2025-04-02. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
Official vote record Official proposal details
House vote #110 · 2025H.J.Res. 60
Yea

House passed resolution to nullify Glen Canyon motor vehicle rule

AI-assisted summary

The joint resolution would nullify a National Park Service rule for motor vehicles in Glen Canyon National Recreation Area. The rule, among other things, limited off-road vehicle use in certain areas. The House passed the resolution; this vote approved the resolution, not the underlying park rule.

Context: The background describes the introduced version of the resolution.

Sources & original record
Official title
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Park Service relating to “Glen Canyon National Recreation Area: Motor Vehicles”
Official question
On Passage
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Park Service relating to “Glen Canyon National Recreation Area: Motor Vehicles”
Legislative background
Introduced in House · 2025-02-21. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
Official vote record Official proposal details
House vote #107 · 2025H.R. 1402
Yea

House passes ticket price disclosure and refund bill

AI-assisted summary

The TICKET Act concerns ticket sales for events, requiring upfront disclosure of total prices and itemized fees, restricting offers by sellers without possession of tickets, and requiring refunds for canceled or postponed events. The House passed the bill under a procedure used for noncontroversial measures. This vote was on House passage, not final enactment.

Context: The available background describes the bill as introduced; it does not establish whether the text changed before passage.

House vote #106 · 2025H.Res. 354
Aye

Set House consideration of park, wildlife, and emissions resolutions

AI-assisted summary

The resolution set the terms for House consideration of five joint resolutions. The dated introduced versions would undo federal actions on off-road vehicle rules at Glen Canyon, endangered-species protections for longfin smelt, and EPA approvals of California vehicle-emissions standards. The House agreed to the rule, which governs consideration; this vote did not pass those joint resolutions.

Context: The policy descriptions refer to introduced versions dated before the vote; they do not establish the exact text considered under the rule.

Sources & original record
Official title
Providing for consideration of the joint resolutions H.J. Res. 60, H.J. Res. 78, H.J. Res. 87, H.J. Res. 88, and H.J. Res. 89
Official question
On Agreeing to the Resolution
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Providing for consideration of the joint resolutions H.J. Res. 60, H.J. Res. 78, H.J. Res. 87, H.J. Res. 88, and H.J. Res. 89
Related proposals
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
Official vote record Official proposal details
House vote #104 · 2025S. 146
Yea

House passed TAKE IT DOWN Act on nonconsensual intimate images

AI-assisted summary

The TAKE IT DOWN Act would prohibit publishing certain intimate images of adults and minors online without consent, including computer-generated depictions. It would also require covered platforms to remove reported depictions within 48 hours and establish a notice process. The House passed the bill; this vote was passage, not a separate vote on each of its requirements.

Context: The background describes the version introduced in the Senate.

Sources & original record
Official title
TAKE IT DOWN Act
Official question
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
TAKE IT DOWN Act
Legislative background
Introduced in Senate · 2025-01-16. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
Official vote record Official proposal details
House vote #102 · 2025H.R. 22
Yea

House passed the SAVE Act on proof of citizenship for voter registration

AI-assisted summary

The SAVE Act would require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote in federal elections and direct states to check voter rolls and remove noncitizens. The House passed the bill; this vote approved the measure in the House, but did not by itself make it law.

Context: The description reflects the version introduced January 3, 2025; the supplied record does not establish whether the passed text differed.

House vote #101 · 2025H.R. 22
Nay

House rejected sending the SAVE Act on voter citizenship proof back to committee

AI-assisted summary

The SAVE Act would require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote in federal elections, with additional state voter-roll checks. The House rejected a motion to recommit the bill—an attempt to return it to committee for further action. That vote did not decide whether the bill's underlying policy should become law.

Context: The supplied record does not describe any instructions or conditions attached to the motion to recommit.

House vote #100 · 2025H.Con.Res. 14
Yea

House accepted Senate changes to the 2025–2034 federal budget resolution

AI-assisted summary

The budget resolution sets recommended federal budget levels for fiscal years 2025–2034 and directs House committees to develop legislation affecting the deficit and statutory debt limit. The House agreed to the Senate amendment, accepting the Senate's changes to the resolution. A budget resolution sets congressional budget guidelines; this vote did not itself enact the legislation that committees may develop.

Context: The supplied background summarizes the version introduced February 18, 2025, and does not detail the Senate changes accepted here.

Sources & original record
Official title
Establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2034
Official question
On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendment
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2034
Legislative background
Introduced in House · 2025-02-18. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
Official vote record Official proposal details
House vote #99 · 2025H.R. 1228
Yea

Require the VA Survivors Assistance Office to report to the Secretary

AI-assisted summary

The Prioritizing Veterans’ Survivors Act would place the Office of Survivors Assistance within the Department of Veterans Affairs Secretary’s office, rather than within the Veterans Benefits Administration. The House passed the bill under a procedure for considering measures on an expedited basis. This vote passed the bill in the House, but does not establish that it became law.

Context: The dated background describes the version introduced on February 12, 2025; the supplied records do not establish whether the text at this vote had been amended.

Sources & original record
Official title
Prioritizing Veterans’ Survivors Act
Official question
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Prioritizing Veterans’ Survivors Act
Legislative background
Introduced in House · 2025-02-12. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
Official vote record Official proposal details
House vote #98 · 2025H.R. 1526
Yea

Pass limits on federal district court injunctions

AI-assisted summary

The No Rogue Rulings Act concerns federal district courts’ authority to issue injunctions. The introduced version would allow an injunction only if it applied to the parties in the case before the court. The House passed the bill; that House vote does not by itself establish that it became law.

Context: The description is for the introduced version dated February 24, 2025; it may not reflect the exact text passed.

House vote #97 · 2025H.R. 1526
Nay

Reject sending the injunction-limits bill back for further action

AI-assisted summary

The No Rogue Rulings Act concerns limits on federal district courts’ authority to issue injunctions; the introduced version would limit injunctions to the parties in the case. The House rejected a motion to recommit, which would have sent the bill back for further action. This procedural vote did not itself pass or defeat the bill’s policy.

Context: The description is for the introduced version dated February 24, 2025; it may not reflect the bill’s text at this vote.

House vote #96 · 2025S.J.Res. 18
Yea

Pass resolution nullifying the CFPB overdraft rule

AI-assisted summary

The resolution would nullify a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau rule on overdraft charges at very large financial institutions. That rule generally capped charges at $5, allowed a higher cap with justification, or treated overdrafts as credit subject to disclosure requirements. The House passed the resolution; passage does not by itself establish that the rule was nullified.

Context: The background describes the rule and resolution version introduced in the Senate on February 13, 2025; it does not establish the exact text approved by the House.

Sources & original record
Official title
Disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to “Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions”
Official question
On Passage
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to “Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions”
Legislative background
Introduced in Senate · 2025-02-13. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
Official vote record Official proposal details
House vote #95 · 2025S.J.Res. 28
Yea

Pass resolution nullifying the CFPB payment-app oversight rule

AI-assisted summary

The resolution would nullify a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau rule defining which nonbank payment-app providers are large enough to be subject to CFPB supervision. The rule covered providers with at least 50 million transactions a year that were not small businesses. The House passed the resolution; passage does not by itself establish that the rule was nullified.

Context: The background describes the rule and resolution version introduced in the Senate on February 27, 2025; it does not establish the exact text approved by the House.

Sources & original record
Official title
Disappoving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to “Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications”
Official question
On Passage
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Disappoving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to “Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications”
Legislative background
Introduced in Senate · 2025-02-27. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
Official vote record Official proposal details
House vote #94 · 2025H.Res. 313
Aye

Approve rules for considering the Senate’s federal budget resolution

AI-assisted summary

The resolution set rules for House consideration of the Senate amendment to H. Con. Res. 14, a congressional budget resolution setting budgetary levels for fiscal year 2025 and fiscal years 2026 through 2034. The House agreed to the resolution, establishing the process for considering that Senate amendment; it did not itself adopt the budget resolution.

Context: The supplied description explains the resolution’s process but does not provide further details of its terms.

Sources & original record
Official title
Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 14) establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2034, and for other purposes
Official question
On Agreeing to the Resolution
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 14) establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2034, and for other purposes
Legislative background
Introduced in House · 2025-04-09. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
Official vote record Official proposal details
House vote #92 · 2025H.Res. 294
Aye

Set consideration of bank fees, payment apps, courts, and voter registration

AI-assisted summary

The resolution set House consideration of two measures to undo CFPB rules on overdraft charges and payment-app oversight, plus bills addressing federal court injunctions and proof of citizenship for federal voter registration. The House agreed to the rule, which governs how those proposals may be considered; this vote did not pass or reject any of them.

Context: The descriptions are based on the listed introduced versions, dated before the vote, and do not establish the exact text considered under the rule.

Sources & original record
Official title
Providing for consideration of the joint resolutions S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28; providing for consideration of the bills H.R. 1526 and H.R. 22; and for other purposes
Official question
On Agreeing to the Resolution
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Providing for consideration of the joint resolutions S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28; providing for consideration of the bills H.R. 1526 and H.R. 22; and for other purposes
Related proposals
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
Official vote record Official proposal details
House vote #91 · 2025H.Res. 294
Yea

Limit debate on bank fees, payment apps, courts, and voter registration rule

AI-assisted summary

The resolution set House consideration of proposals concerning CFPB rules on overdraft charges and payment-app oversight, limits on federal court injunctions, and documentary proof of citizenship for federal voter registration. The House ordered the previous question, limiting further debate on the rule and bringing it toward a vote. This procedural vote did not decide those proposals’ policies.

Context: The descriptions are based on the listed introduced versions, dated before the vote, and do not establish the exact text considered under the rule.

Sources & original record
Official title
Providing for consideration of the joint resolutions S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28; providing for consideration of the bills H.R. 1526 and H.R. 22; and for other purposes
Official question
On Ordering the Previous Question
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Providing for consideration of the joint resolutions S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28; providing for consideration of the bills H.R. 1526 and H.R. 22; and for other purposes
Related proposals
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
Official vote record Official proposal details
House vote #90 · 2025H.R. 1039
Yea

Pass VA claims-notice reviews and extend home-loan fee rates

AI-assisted summary

The bill requires the Department of Veterans Affairs to seek an independent research center’s assessment of notices sent to people applying for or submitting VA benefit claims, report the findings, and implement recommendations. It also extends certain VA home-loan fee rates through June 23, 2034. The House passed the bill as amended on a motion to suspend the rules and pass; this vote alone does not establish that it became law.

Context: The description is for the introduced version dated February 6, 2025; the House passed an amended bill, and the supplied record does not describe the amendments.

Sources & original record
Official title
Clear Communication for Veterans Claims Act
Official question
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Clear Communication for Veterans Claims Act
Legislative background
Introduced in House · 2025-02-06. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
Official vote record Official proposal details
House vote #89 · 2025H.R. 586
Yea

Pass the Vietnam veterans bile duct cancer study bill

AI-assisted summary

The bill requires the Department of Veterans Affairs to study bile duct cancer among veterans who served in Vietnam and compare its prevalence with that among U.S. residents. It also calls for cancer-registry tracking and reports to Congress. The House passed the bill as amended; this vote approved the bill, not merely a step to begin considering it.

Context: The background describes the bill as introduced on January 21, 2025; the House vote was on an amended version, whose exact text is not provided.

Sources & original record
Official title
Vietnam Veterans Liver Fluke Cancer Study Act
Official question
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Vietnam Veterans Liver Fluke Cancer Study Act
Legislative background
Introduced in House · 2025-01-21. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
Official vote record Official proposal details