Skip to content
Hill Policy
FL · DISTRICT 6

Randy Fine

RepublicanFloridaCurrently serving

Sworn in for the 119th Congress on Source

How they voted 593

Their recorded votes in Congress, including what was decided and how they voted.

Yea/Aye supports the question being voted on. Nay/No opposes it. Colors describe the recorded choice, not a political rating.

Partial vote history. See collection coverage

House vote #101 · 2025H.R. 22
Nay

House rejected sending the SAVE Act on voter citizenship proof back to committee

AI-assisted summary

The SAVE Act would require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote in federal elections, with additional state voter-roll checks. The House rejected a motion to recommit the bill—an attempt to return it to committee for further action. That vote did not decide whether the bill's underlying policy should become law.

Context: The supplied record does not describe any instructions or conditions attached to the motion to recommit.

House vote #100 · 2025H.Con.Res. 14
Yea

House accepted Senate changes to the 2025–2034 federal budget resolution

AI-assisted summary

The budget resolution sets recommended federal budget levels for fiscal years 2025–2034 and directs House committees to develop legislation affecting the deficit and statutory debt limit. The House agreed to the Senate amendment, accepting the Senate's changes to the resolution. A budget resolution sets congressional budget guidelines; this vote did not itself enact the legislation that committees may develop.

Context: The supplied background summarizes the version introduced February 18, 2025, and does not detail the Senate changes accepted here.

Sources & original record
Official title
Establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2034
Official question
On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendment
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2034
Legislative background
Introduced in House · 2025-02-18. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
House vote #99 · 2025H.R. 1228
Yea

Require the VA Survivors Assistance Office to report to the Secretary

AI-assisted summary

The Prioritizing Veterans’ Survivors Act would place the Office of Survivors Assistance within the Department of Veterans Affairs Secretary’s office, rather than within the Veterans Benefits Administration. The House passed the bill under a procedure for considering measures on an expedited basis. This vote passed the bill in the House, but does not establish that it became law.

Context: The dated background describes the version introduced on February 12, 2025; the supplied records do not establish whether the text at this vote had been amended.

Sources & original record
Official title
Prioritizing Veterans’ Survivors Act
Official question
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Prioritizing Veterans’ Survivors Act
Legislative background
Introduced in House · 2025-02-12. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
House vote #98 · 2025H.R. 1526
Yea

Pass limits on federal district court injunctions

AI-assisted summary

The No Rogue Rulings Act concerns federal district courts’ authority to issue injunctions. The introduced version would allow an injunction only if it applied to the parties in the case before the court. The House passed the bill; that House vote does not by itself establish that it became law.

Context: The description is for the introduced version dated February 24, 2025; it may not reflect the exact text passed.

House vote #97 · 2025H.R. 1526
Nay

Reject sending the injunction-limits bill back for further action

AI-assisted summary

The No Rogue Rulings Act concerns limits on federal district courts’ authority to issue injunctions; the introduced version would limit injunctions to the parties in the case. The House rejected a motion to recommit, which would have sent the bill back for further action. This procedural vote did not itself pass or defeat the bill’s policy.

Context: The description is for the introduced version dated February 24, 2025; it may not reflect the bill’s text at this vote.

House vote #96 · 2025S.J.Res. 18
Yea

Pass resolution nullifying the CFPB overdraft rule

AI-assisted summary

The resolution would nullify a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau rule on overdraft charges at very large financial institutions. That rule generally capped charges at $5, allowed a higher cap with justification, or treated overdrafts as credit subject to disclosure requirements. The House passed the resolution; passage does not by itself establish that the rule was nullified.

Context: The background describes the rule and resolution version introduced in the Senate on February 13, 2025; it does not establish the exact text approved by the House.

Sources & original record
Official title
Disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to “Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions”
Official question
On Passage
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to “Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions”
Legislative background
Introduced in Senate · 2025-02-13. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
House vote #95 · 2025S.J.Res. 28
Yea

Pass resolution nullifying the CFPB payment-app oversight rule

AI-assisted summary

The resolution would nullify a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau rule defining which nonbank payment-app providers are large enough to be subject to CFPB supervision. The rule covered providers with at least 50 million transactions a year that were not small businesses. The House passed the resolution; passage does not by itself establish that the rule was nullified.

Context: The background describes the rule and resolution version introduced in the Senate on February 27, 2025; it does not establish the exact text approved by the House.

Sources & original record
Official title
Disappoving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to “Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications”
Official question
On Passage
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Disappoving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to “Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications”
Legislative background
Introduced in Senate · 2025-02-27. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
House vote #94 · 2025H.Res. 313
Aye

Approve rules for considering the Senate’s federal budget resolution

AI-assisted summary

The resolution set rules for House consideration of the Senate amendment to H. Con. Res. 14, a congressional budget resolution setting budgetary levels for fiscal year 2025 and fiscal years 2026 through 2034. The House agreed to the resolution, establishing the process for considering that Senate amendment; it did not itself adopt the budget resolution.

Context: The supplied description explains the resolution’s process but does not provide further details of its terms.

Sources & original record
Official title
Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 14) establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2034, and for other purposes
Official question
On Agreeing to the Resolution
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 14) establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2034, and for other purposes
Legislative background
Introduced in House · 2025-04-09. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
House vote #93 · 2025H.Res. 313
Yea

End debate on rules for considering the Senate budget amendment

AI-assisted summary

The resolution concerned House consideration of the Senate amendment to H. Con. Res. 14, which sets congressional budget levels for fiscal year 2025 and fiscal years 2026 through 2034. The House ordered the previous question, ending debate on the resolution and bringing it to a vote; this did not adopt the Senate budget amendment or the budget resolution itself.

Context: The supplied description summarizes the budget resolution, not the detailed terms of the House’s procedural resolution.

Sources & original record
Official title
Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 14) establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2034, and for other purposes
Official question
On Ordering the Previous Question
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 14) establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2034, and for other purposes
Legislative background
Introduced in House · 2025-04-09. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
House vote #92 · 2025H.Res. 294
Aye

Set consideration of bank fees, payment apps, courts, and voter registration

AI-assisted summary

The resolution set House consideration of two measures to undo CFPB rules on overdraft charges and payment-app oversight, plus bills addressing federal court injunctions and proof of citizenship for federal voter registration. The House agreed to the rule, which governs how those proposals may be considered; this vote did not pass or reject any of them.

Context: The descriptions are based on the listed introduced versions, dated before the vote, and do not establish the exact text considered under the rule.

Sources & original record
Official title
Providing for consideration of the joint resolutions S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28; providing for consideration of the bills H.R. 1526 and H.R. 22; and for other purposes
Official question
On Agreeing to the Resolution
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Providing for consideration of the joint resolutions S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28; providing for consideration of the bills H.R. 1526 and H.R. 22; and for other purposes
Related proposals
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
House vote #91 · 2025H.Res. 294
Yea

Limit debate on bank fees, payment apps, courts, and voter registration rule

AI-assisted summary

The resolution set House consideration of proposals concerning CFPB rules on overdraft charges and payment-app oversight, limits on federal court injunctions, and documentary proof of citizenship for federal voter registration. The House ordered the previous question, limiting further debate on the rule and bringing it toward a vote. This procedural vote did not decide those proposals’ policies.

Context: The descriptions are based on the listed introduced versions, dated before the vote, and do not establish the exact text considered under the rule.

Sources & original record
Official title
Providing for consideration of the joint resolutions S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28; providing for consideration of the bills H.R. 1526 and H.R. 22; and for other purposes
Official question
On Ordering the Previous Question
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Providing for consideration of the joint resolutions S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28; providing for consideration of the bills H.R. 1526 and H.R. 22; and for other purposes
Related proposals
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
House vote #90 · 2025H.R. 1039
Yea

Pass VA claims-notice reviews and extend home-loan fee rates

AI-assisted summary

The bill requires the Department of Veterans Affairs to seek an independent research center’s assessment of notices sent to people applying for or submitting VA benefit claims, report the findings, and implement recommendations. It also extends certain VA home-loan fee rates through June 23, 2034. The House passed the bill as amended on a motion to suspend the rules and pass; this vote alone does not establish that it became law.

Context: The description is for the introduced version dated February 6, 2025; the House passed an amended bill, and the supplied record does not describe the amendments.

Sources & original record
Official title
Clear Communication for Veterans Claims Act
Official question
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Clear Communication for Veterans Claims Act
Legislative background
Introduced in House · 2025-02-06. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1
House vote #89 · 2025H.R. 586
Yea

Pass the Vietnam veterans bile duct cancer study bill

AI-assisted summary

The bill requires the Department of Veterans Affairs to study bile duct cancer among veterans who served in Vietnam and compare its prevalence with that among U.S. residents. It also calls for cancer-registry tracking and reports to Congress. The House passed the bill as amended; this vote approved the bill, not merely a step to begin considering it.

Context: The background describes the bill as introduced on January 21, 2025; the House vote was on an amended version, whose exact text is not provided.

Sources & original record
Official title
Vietnam Veterans Liver Fluke Cancer Study Act
Official question
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended
Chamber result
Passed
Measure title
Vietnam Veterans Liver Fluke Cancer Study Act
Legislative background
Introduced in House · 2025-01-21. This is separate from the date of the vote.
Congress
119th Congress · Session 1